🌱GMODebate.org 우생학 조사

Investigations

🦋 GMODebate.org investigates the philosophical roots of eugenics and traces it to scientism and the centuries older emancipation of science movement.

This website contains various investigations of corruption regarding the enforcement of GMO.

Stop Ecocide International

A conversation with Stop Ecocide International resulted in an article about the GMO based eradication of the 🦟 mosquito species, in an attempt to provide an example case for why it is important to address the subject in ecocide law.

Eugenics and the Essence of Inbreeding

Our investigation of the philosophical roots of eugenics reveals that eugenics resides on the essence of inbreeding.

Simple logic reveals the correlation at first sight. A philosopher on the discussion forum of Philosophy Now magazine captured the essence of eugenics as following:

blond hair and blue eyes for everyone

utopia

Our notion goes beyond a mere increasingly limited and vulnerable gene pool due to loss of genetic diversity and touches on the deeper reason that inbreeding causes adverse effects in the first place which requires a fundamental different perspective than the status quo scientific understanding of inbreeding.

Cows in the US have been driven to near extinction from a genetic perspective due to the logical consequences of eugenics. While there are 9 million diary cows in the US, from a genetic perspective there are just 50 cows alive.

The founder of 🦋 GMODebate.org has investigated the roots of eugenics and scientism since as early as 2006 through the critical blog 🦋Zielenknijper.com.

The Dutch blog was founded in cooperation with Dutch philosophy professor Wim J. van der Steen who was an intellectual opponent of psychiatry and the idea that the mind originates in the brain.

The blog contains an investigation of political corruption surrounding the legislation of euthanasia in psychiatry. In 2010 Dutch psychiatrists enforced the right to euthanize their patients by releasing their patients to commit suicide on the streets, which looked like a political extortion tactic.

Our article about eugenics reveals that medical psychiatry and eugenics were founded simultaneously and were based on the same core philosophical ideas. The article reveals that the mechanism perspective of mind logically results in eugenic ideologies.

French philosopher Michel Foucault:

[Medical] psychiatry was a bridge between the clinical gaze and the evolutionary narrative—a bridge built from bricks of mechanism, waiting for Darwin's cement of purpose.

German philosopher Max Horkheimer:

Science's emancipation from philosophy birthed a new barbarism—one that worships efficiency and discards the human.

Scientism

Our investigation of eugenics traces it to scientism and reveals that it is an escape attempt: a retreat from the fundamental uncertainty of nature into an illusory certain empirical realm.

🇷🇺 Russian trolls, aided by anti-GMO groups such as the 🍒 Center for Food Safety and Organic Consumers Association, have been strikingly successful in sowing doubt about science in the general population.

(2018) Anti-GMO activism sows doubt about science Source: Alliance for Science

Within this context, science attempts to create a situation of war against science in which opponents can be challenged and combatted on ideological rather than philosophical grounds.

Justin B. Biddle

The anti-science or war on science narrative has become popular among science journalists. While there is no question that some opponents of GMO are biased or ignorant of the relevant facts, the blanket tendency to characterize critics as anti-science or engaged in a war on science is both misguided and dangerous.

(2018) “Anti-science zealotry”? Values, Epistemic Risk, and the GMO Debate 출처: PhilPapers | justinbiddle.com (Georgia Institute of Technology)

Our investigation of the application of the anti-science narrative in 🇵🇭 Philippines reveals that the label is weaponized alongside calls for literal prosecution.

In 2021, the international science establishment called for anti-science to be combated as a security threat on par with terrorism and nuclear proliferation:

Antiscience has emerged as a dominant and highly lethal force, and one that threatens global security, as much as do terrorism and nuclear proliferation. We must mount a counteroffensive and build new infrastructure to combat antiscience, just as we have for these other more widely recognized and established threats.

(2021) The Antiscience Movement Is Escalating, Going Global and Killing Thousands 출처: Scientific American

The path of feeling threatened by doubt, seeking a context of war on science for ideological combat of opponents and subsequent calls for prosecution, represents a modern form of inquisition of heretics.

Daniel C. Dennett Charles Darwin 찰스 다윈인가, 대니얼 데닛인가?

As part of our investigation of scientism, 🦋 GMODebate.org published the philosophy discussion On the Absurd Hegemony of Science in which renowned philosophy professor Daniel C. Dennett (known for his best seller Darwin's Dangerous Idea) participated in defense of scientism.

For those interested in the views of Daniel C. Dennett, chapter Dennett's Defense of His Rejection of 🧠⃤ Qualia contains over 400 posts debating Dennett's rejection of the philosophical concept Qualia.

A book without an end… One of the most popular philosophy discussions in recent history.

📲 (2025) On the absurd hegemony of science 출처: 🦋 GMODebate.org | Download as PDF and ePub

Other Investigations

A pattern over the years has been the investigation of various cases of corruption, which are now published on ✈️ MH17Truth.org.

One of the latest investigations is Google's corruption for AI life forms or its digital species that are to replace the human species for an apparent wicked techno eugenics related idea.

Other investigations include:

🔭 CosmicPhilosophy.org

Our new 2025 project CosmicPhilosophy.org investigates the dogmatic nature of science and advocates that science should return to its original status Natural Philosophy.

Albert Einstein versus Philosophy On The Nature of 🕒 Time And Philosophy's Great Setback For Scientism The shift from natural philosophy to physics started with Galileo and Newton's mathematical theories in the 1600s, however, energy and mass conservation were considered separate laws that lacked philosophical grounding. This changed fundamentally with Einstein's famous equation E=mc², which unified energy conservation with mass conservation. This unification created a kind of epistemological bootstrap that enabled physics to achieve self-justification, escaping the need for philosophical grounding altogether. This historical investigation of the Einstein-Bergson (science versus philosophy) debate that would cause the great setback for philosophy in history reveals that French philosopher Henri Bergson lost the debate on purpose for the advancement of scientism. 출처: 🔭 CosmicPhilosophy.org

Other investigations include:

서문 /
    Ελληνικά그리스어gr🇬🇷Nederlands네덜란드어nl🇳🇱नेपाली네팔어np🇳🇵Bokmål노르웨이어no🇳🇴dansk덴마크어dk🇩🇰Deutsch독일어de🇩🇪Latviešu라트비아어lv🇱🇻Русский러시아어ru🇷🇺Română루마니아어ro🇷🇴Lietuvių리투아니아어lt🇱🇹मराठी마라티어mr🇮🇳Melayu말레이어my🇲🇾မြန်မာ미얀마어mm🇲🇲Tiếng Việt베트남어vn🇻🇳беларуская벨라루스어by🇧🇾বাংলা벵골어bd🇧🇩Bosanski보스니아어ba🇧🇦български불가리아어bg🇧🇬Српски세르비아어rs🇷🇸svenska스웨덴어se🇸🇪Español스페인어es🇪🇸slovenčina슬로바키아어sk🇸🇰slovenščina슬로베니아어si🇸🇮සිංහල싱할라어lk🇱🇰العربية아랍어ar🇸🇦eesti에스토니아어ee🇪🇪English영어us🇺🇸اردو우르두어pk🇵🇰O'zbekcha우즈베크어uz🇺🇿Українська우크라이나어ua🇺🇦Italiano이탈리아어it🇮🇹Bahasa인도네시아어id🇮🇩日本語일본어jp🇯🇵ქართული조지아어ge🇬🇪简体중국어cn🇨🇳繁體번체 중국어hk🇭🇰čeština체코어cz🇨🇿Қазақша카자흐어kz🇰🇿Hrvatski크로아티아어hr🇭🇷Tagalog타갈로그어ph🇵🇭தமிழ்타밀어ta🇱🇰ไทย태국어th🇹🇭Türkçe터키어tr🇹🇷తెలుగు텔루구어te🇮🇳ਪੰਜਾਬੀ펀자브어pa🇮🇳فارسی페르시아어ir🇮🇷Português포르투갈어pt🇵🇹polski폴란드어pl🇵🇱français프랑스어fr🇫🇷suomi핀란드어fi🇫🇮한국어한국어kr🇰🇷magyar헝가리어hu🇭🇺עברית히브리어il🇮🇱हिंदी힌디어hi🇮🇳